Jul. 16th, 2004

whitereflection: (tomorrow's door lelola)
Dad's already gotten the NG tube out, and sounds a lot more alert and in good spirits (less pain meds and such will do that, I suppose...). Sounds like there's a chance he might even get out today. At the least, they'll move him from the jello/broth of yesterday to real solid food. Which I guess he's been craving. ^^; I don't blame him.

My glasses are going to be the most cursed-jinxed things ever. ._. Did the appt. and ordered them before AX. Since then, the store's already sent them back twice for flaws they found on inspection, and I heard that at least a couple times the re-makings took longer due to 'lens breakages'. Then they had to send them back a third time, because the antireflective coating had been done oddly, so it was somehow different on each lens. Then I get a call this am that there was another 'breakage'. ._. So they're making me up a temporary set (it'll be all the special things I need, just on thicker lenses), so I have something while I'm waiting for them to remake the lenses entirely from scratch. So...yeah. Malbar is a reputable company, one of the good optometrists in town, but still...major, major run of bad luck. Glasses of doom... ._. *ph34r*

Ever had daydreams that just leave you giddy and giggly, even if there's no way they could happen? ... >_>; I get dumb on wishing.

Anyway...gotta drop James off super early for all-day Amptguard stuff tomorrow. Then I do the fittings for my glasses (I'll keep the frames & they'll just switch out to the permanent lenses eventually. if they ever get it right >_>; ). Would really like to zip off to the zoo for a while after, maybe make a quick manga run to B&N, then re-watch some YnM. At least the Kyoto arc...been really wanting some time alone so I can watch that and get as emotional as I want <3 Then there's a get together at Don's tomorrow evening. So, interestingness. Will finally be able to give Don his little trinket from AX (Wah...reminds me, I need to do some packaging/post officing soon...)

Only minor improvements in productivity today. Very minor. Haven't even been reading...just have been slow for some reason. *sighs* And there's so little of the day left already...
whitereflection: (leo augh! holy crap.vgcats!tours)
Anj spotted this on the Autocat mailing list (an international ml for discussion of cataloging and authority control such things...you know, library fun) during a discussion of just how to word a particular note for certain records.

It's starts with:
> "How many catalogers does it take to change a lightbulb?
> Don't know yet, they are still looking through the rule books and discussing it."

Which was then followed by the response:
> Not to mention the catalogers waiting for studies on whether the lightbulb
> really needs replacing and non-offensive ways to describe the replacing
> (surely there's a less offensive term than "screwing in the lightbulb"
> ...), plus the sizeable number of us--me included--who would rather defer
> a decision until LC [Library of Congress] sets a precedent. You just can't be too careful.

And then this followed, from someone at the Harvard Law School Library:
> The question of whether using P. [4] of the cover is or is not
> cataloger-speak and the question of how many catalogers it takes to change
> a light bulb are in many ways inextricably linked. After all, we must
> determine if the bulb is incandescent or fluorescent, what its size is in
> centimeters (especially if it's an oversize bulb), what its wattage is,
> whether it's too U.S.-centric to call it a "light bulb" in the first
> place, whether the reference to "light" bulbs could be construed as an
> obscure chauvinistic reference to the Western Christian ethos, if light
> bulbs might not properly be identified by their scientific genus name, and
> many other factors. Then we must consider if the light bulb will be
> visible from other people through a shared international network (changing
> it by internationally accepted rules) or if it can be seen only by the
> inhabitants of our own library (bending the rules a bit for our local
> viewers). Then we should ascertain whether light bulbs can or should be
> changed by staff with graduate library educations or if well-trained
> paraprofessionals are capable of doing the job. It might behoove us to
> determine just how many light bulbs a staff member should be expected to
> change in a given work day. And finally we should consider if we really
> need paid staff to do this kind of task or whether we should recruit a
> volunteer from the community to do it. (Oh, wait, we really ought to
> explore outsourcing options for light-bulb changing work, while we're at
> it!)


Hahahahaha, people in this line of work are on crack.
(So does this explain why I have to make sure the artist/title/album info on my mp3s are all labelled just so?)

(No? Oh.)

(And this is to keep me from angsting how I ran into Take-sensei when she stopped by to talk to Anj today, and how my brain was screaming at me "You haven't studied a damned bit since early May, and somehow she'll know! You said you'd call her about seeing your final before AX, and you still haven't! Embarassment dooooom!" -_- )

August 2012

S M T W T F S
   123 4
567891011
12131415161718
19202122 232425
262728293031 

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios